Howell v. Mississippi

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Ronnie M. Mitchell (argued the cause for Petitioner)
James M. Hood, III (argued the cause for Respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
03-9560
Petitioner: 
Marlon Latodd Howell, aka Marlon Cox
Respondent: 
Mississippi
Opinion: 
543 U.S. 440 (2005)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Howell v. Mississippi , 543 U.S. 440 (2005)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_9560)
Facts of the Case: 

A Mississippi court convicted Marlon Howell of capital murder - murder committed during a felony - and sentenced him to death. Howell appealed and argued the trial court was wrong to deny the jury the option of finding Howell guilty of the lesser offenses of non-capital murder or manslaughter, for which the death penalty would not have been an option. The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled against Howell and said there was no evidence to support lesser charges.

Question: 

1.) In death penalty cases can a state court refuse to give a jury the option of finding a defendant guilty of at least one lesser offense if it is recognized by state law and supported by evidence? 2.) Was Howell's federal constitutional claim properly raised before the Mississippi Supreme Court?

Conclusion: 

In a unanimous per curiam opinion, the Court dismissed the case because Howell had not first raised his federal constitutional claims in state court.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Mississippi, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 28 U.S.C. 1257

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Per Curiam with Argument