Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Frederick E. Connelly, Jr. (argued the cause for Respondent)
Lisa Schiavo Blatt (argued the cause for Petitioner, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae)
David B. Kaplan (argued the cause for Petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
03-814
Petitioner: 
Willard Stewart
Respondent: 
Dutra Construction Company
Opinion: 
543 U.S. 481 (2005)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company , 543 U.S. 481 (2005)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_814)
Facts of the Case: 

Willard Stewart was injured while working on a dredge (a machine for underwater digging) for Dutra, a dredging company. Stewart alleged Dutra was negligent and sued the company in federal district court under the Jones Act. The district court ruled a dredge is not a "vessel in navigation" as defined by the Jones Act and therefore Stewart could not sue under the act. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question: 

Is a dredge a "vessel" under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA)?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held that the Revised Statutes of 1873 specified that in any act passed after 1871, "vessel" included any watercraft capable of transportation. The requirement that a worker be on a vessel "in navigation," required by the LHWCA, simply meant that the vessel be capable of transportation. This included dredges which, both then and now, transported equipment and a crew over water.

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Stewart, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Longshoremen and Harbor Workers' Compensation

Sort by Seniority

Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Did not participate
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas