Leocal v. Ashcroft

Media Items
Leocal v. Ashcroft - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Leocal v. Ashcroft - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Joseph S. Sollers, III (argued the cause for Petitioner)
Dan Himmelfarb (argued the cause for Respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
03-583
Petitioner: 
Josue Leocal
Respondent: 
John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.
Opinion: 
543 U.S. 1 (2004)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Leocal v. Ashcroft , 543 U.S. 1 (2004)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_583)
Facts of the Case: 

A Florida court convicted Vietnam citizen Duan Le for driving under the influence and causing serious bodily injury. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) charged in federal immigration court that Le should be deported. The INS argued Le committed a crime of violence that was an aggravated felony under federal immigration laws - a deportable crime. The immigration court and an appellate immigration court ruled Le could be deported. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed.

Question: 

Is a conviction of driving under the influence and causing serious bodily injury a "crime of violence" under federal immigration law that allows the person to be deported as an aggravated felon?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous decision delivered by Chief Justice William Rhenquist, the Court held that state DUI offenses, except when involving purposeful intent, are accidental and not crimes of violence under federal law. Le therefore did not commit an aggravated felony for which he could be deported.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Leocal, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets, National Firearms, Organized Crime Control, Comprehensive Crime Control, or Gun Control Acts, except for RICO (q.v.) portion

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court