The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Granted: Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Argument: Monday, February 28, 2005
Decision: Monday, June 6, 2005
Issues: Civil Rights, Rights of Handicapped

Advocates

David C. Frederick (argued the cause for Respondent)
Gregory G. Garre (argued the cause for Respondent)
Thomas C. Goldstein (argued the cause for Petitioners)
David B. Salmons (argued the cause for Petitioners)

Facts of the Case

A group of disabled people who travelled on Norwegian Cruise Line ships sued the company in federal district court and alleged two of its ships did not conform with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The company argued the ADA did not apply to the two ships because, though the ships sailed out of Texas, they sailed under the Bahamian flag. The district court dismissed the group's claims and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled foreign-flagged cruise ships are not subject to Title III of the ADA.

Question

Does Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act apply to foreign-flagged cruise ships in U.S. waters?

Conclusion

Yes. The Court held 6-3 that Title III applied to foreign-flag cruise ships in U.S. waters. Justice Kennedy delivered the Court's controlling opinion, which held that Title III did not apply to foreign ships' internal affairs, because there was no "clear congressional statement" showing an intent to do so. A clear statement was necessary before a general law could interfere with a foreign-vessel's internal affairs. Title III's own limitations, however, prevented the statute from imposing requirements that would have threatened safety on the ship or conflicted with international obligations. If Title III were to impose certain requirements, such as major structural modifications, the clear statement rule could bar such an interference.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Spector, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a special concurrence
Thomas
Wrote a regular concurrence
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority, joined Ginsburg's concurrence
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line Ltd., 545 U.S. ___ (2005),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_1388/>
(last visited ).