The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Granted: Friday, January 7, 2005
Argument: Monday, April 25, 2005
Decision: Thursday, June 23, 2005
Issues: Civil Rights, Indigents, Appointment of Counsel

Advocates

David A. Moran (argued the cause for Petitioner)
Bernard E. Restuccia (argued the cause for Respondent)
Gene C. Schaerr (argued the cause for Respondent)

Facts of the Case

Halbert pleaded no contest in a Michigan court to two counts of criminal sexual conduct. The day after Halbert's sentence was imposed, Halbert moved to withdraw his plea. The trial court denied the motion and told Halbert the property remedy for his complaint was the state appellate court. Michigan required a defendant convicted on a guilty or no contest plea to apply for leave of appeal to the state appellate court. Halbert asked the trial court twice to appoint counsel to help him with his application. The trial court refused. Without counsel, Halbert still applied for leave to appeal, which the court of appeals denied. The state supreme court also denied Halbert's application for leave to appeal to that court.

Question

Did the due process and equal protection clauses require the appointment of counsel for defendants, convicted on their pleas, who sought access to a Michigan appellate court?

Conclusion

Yes. In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that the due process and equal protection clauses required Michigan to provide counsel for defendants who wanted to appeal to the state appellate court. The Court reasoned that if indigent defendants convicted on their pleas did not have counsel to guide them through Michigan's complex appellate process, their right to appeal would not be meaningful.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Halbert, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Equal Protection
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Thomas' dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a dissent
Thomas
Wrote the majority opinion
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Halbert v. Michigan, 545 U.S. ___ (2005),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_10198/>
(last visited ).