The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Granted: Monday, February 24, 2003
Argument: Wednesday, October 8, 2003
Decision: Tuesday, December 2, 2003
Issues: Civil Rights, Rights of Handicapped

Advocates

Paul D. Clement (argued the cause for Petitioner, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae)
Stephen G. Montoya (argued the cause for Respondent)
Carter G. Phillips (argued the cause for Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

In 1991, Joel Hernandez tested positive for cocaine use in a drug test administered by his employer. As a result of the incident, he was forced to resign. In 1994, he reapplied for a job from the company. His application was rejected. Hernandez claimed that the company was discriminating against him because of his drug and alcohol addiction (though at the time he reapplied he had been sober for two years) in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The district court sided with the company, dismissing the case before it ever went to trial. A Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel unanimously reversed, however, holding that Raytheon's decision not to rehire Hernandez because of an incident related to his past addiction could constitute discrimination under the act.

Question

Does the Americans with Disabilities Act permit employers to refuse to rehire job applicants because of prior workplace rule infractions related to drug or alcohol addiction?

Conclusion

Yes. The Court unanimously held that an employer may refuse to rehire an employee who was terminated in connection with drug or alcohol-related incidents as long as the refusal is based on a policy of not rehiring employees who previously violated workplace rules rather than on the worker's addiction. That is, an employer may refuse to hire someone who was terminated for coming to work under the influence, but may not refuse to hire someone whose previous addiction did not result in any workplace rule infractions. Justices David Souter and Stephen Breyer took no part in this case.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for Raytheon, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Did not participate
Souter
Did not participate
Breyer
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Raytheon v. Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44 (2003),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2003/2003_02_749/>
(last visited ).