Olympic Airways v. Husain

Media Items
Olympic Airways v. Husain - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Olympic Airways v. Husain - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Barbara B. McDowell (argued the cause for Respondents)
Andrew J. Harakas (argued the cause for Petitioner)
H. Bartow Farr, III (argued the cause for Respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
02-1348
Petitioner: 
Olympic Airways
Respondent: 
Rubina Husain, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abid M. Hanson, Deceased, et al.
Opinion: 
540 U.S. 644 (2004)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Olympic Airways v. Husain , 540 U.S. 644 (2004)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2003/2003_02_1348)
Facts of the Case: 

Abid Hanson was allergic to second-hand smoke. On an Olympic Airways flight, he and his wife, Rubina Husain, sat in non-smoking seats. However, because the seats were close to the smoking section, Mrs. Husain requested she and her husband be moved. Her request was denied twice, even after the smoke began bothering Hanson. Hanson died during the flight. Husain filed suit in California federal district court. She sought damages under Article 17 of the Warsaw Convention, which allows damages recovery for international air travelers for accidents on airplanes. The district court agreed that Hanson's death was an ""accident"" as defined by the convention and awarded Husain $1.4 million. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question: 

If a passenger's pre-existing medical condition is aggravated by exposure to normal airplane conditions, is this an "accident" under the Warsaw Convention's Article 17 (for which the airline is responsible)?

Conclusion: 

Yes. Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the Court's 6-2 opinion that the events on the airplane were an "accident" under the Warsaw Convention's Article 17. The Court cited its 1985 decision in Air France v. Saks, in which it decided any "injury is the product of a chain of causes" and that an accident occurs when "some link in the chain was an unusual or unexpected event external to the passenger." The Court rejected Olympic Airways' argument that only the cigarette smoke was relevant and that no "accident" took place because the flight attended simply did not act. The flight attendant's refusal three times to reseat Husain was a "link in the chain" of causes leading to his death and the attendant's rejection of an explicit request for assistance was an "event."

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Husain, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Treaty

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Did not participate
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court