USPS v. Flamingo Industries

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Edwin S. Kneedler (argued the cause for Petitioner)
Harold J. Krent (argued the cause for Respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
02-1290
Petitioner: 
United States Postal Service
Respondent: 
Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd., et al.
Opinion: 
540 U.S. 736 (2004)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, USPS v. Flamingo Industries , 540 U.S. 736 (2004)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2003/2003_02_1290)
Facts of the Case: 

When the U.S. Postal Service ended its mail-sack contract with Flamingo Industries, Flamingo sued in U.S. district court. Flamingo claimed the Postal Service declared a "fake emergency in the supply of mail sacks" so it could give no-bid contracts to cheaper foreign manufacturers without allowing U.S. companies to compete for them. Flamingo claimed this violated federal antitrust laws (among other charges). The district court dismissed the antitrust claim reasoning that the federal government is protected by sovereign immunity. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed on the antitrust immunity count. It ruled that the 1970 Postal Reorganization Act waived the Postal Service's sovereign immunity and that it could be sued under federal antitrust laws as a "person."

Question: 

Can the U.S. Postal Service be sued under federal antitrust laws?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court held that the U.S. Postal Service cannot be sued under antitrust laws. The Court acknowledged the Postal Reorganization Act may waive the Postal Service's immunity from suit. However, federal antitrust laws (the Sherman Act, for example) do not allow the federal government - of which the Postal Service is a part - to be sued.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for USPS, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Sherman

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy