Great-West Life and Annuity Ins. v. Knudson

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Richard G. Taranto (Argued the cause for the respondents)
James F. Jorden (On behalf of the petitioners)
Paul R. Q. Wolfson (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of court, supporting the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
99-1786
Petitioner: 
Great-West Life and Annuity Ins.
Respondent: 
Knudson
Opinion: 
534 U.S. 204 (2002)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Great-West Life and Annuity Ins. v. Knudson , 534 U.S. 204 (2002)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_99_1786)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1992, a car accident rendered Janette Knudson a quadriplegic. At that time, Knudson was covered by the Health and Welfare Plan for Employees and Dependents of Earth Systems, Inc. (the Plan), which covered $411,157.11 of her medical expenses, most of which were paid by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. The Plan contains a reimbursement provision, which gives it the right to recover from a beneficiary any payment for benefits paid by the Plan that the beneficiary is entitled to recover from a third party. After Knudson filed a state-court tort action to recover from the manufacturer of her car and others, she negotiated a settlement that earmarked $13,828.70 to satisfy Great-West's reimbursement claim. Great-West then filed an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to enforce the Plan's reimbursement provision by requiring Knudson to pay the Plan $411,157.11 of any proceeds recovered from third parties. The District Court granted Knudson summary judgment. In affirming, the Court of Appeals held that that judicially decreed reimbursement for payments made to a beneficiary of an insurance plan by a third party is not equitable relief authorized by ERISA.

Question: 

Does the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 authorize a suit to enforce a reimbursement provision by a health plan to recover from a beneficiary any proceeds paid by a third party?

Conclusion: 

No. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court held that because Great-West is seeking legal relief - the imposition of personal liability on Knudson for a contractual obligation to pay money - ERISA does not authorize this action. The Court reasoned that the suit, which sought relief under section 502(a)(3) of ERISA, was not authorized under ERISA's catch-all provision authorizing equitable relief because the claim was for a legal remedy, or monetary damages. Justice Scalia wrote that "an injunction to compel the payment of money past due under a contract, or specific performance of a past due monetary obligation, was not typically available in equity." Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg filed dissents. Justices David H. Souter and Stephen G. Breyer joined in Justice Ginsburg's dissent.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Knudson, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the minority, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia