The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 20, 2002
Decision: Monday, April 1, 2002
Issues: Judicial Power, Writ Improvidently Granted

Advocates

John Crabtree (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Glen D. Nager (Argued the cause for the respondents)

Facts of the Case

The Florida Power Corporation (FPC) operated as a publicly-regulated electric utility monopoly until 1992, when Congress opened the industry to competition through the Energy Policy Act of 1992. Between 1992 and 1996, FPR terminated Wanda Adams and others during a series of reorganizations the company stated were necessary to maintain its competitiveness. Members of the Adams class sued FPC, claiming that FPC discriminated against them because of their age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). In 1996, the District Court conditionally certified a class of former FPC employees claiming age discrimination. In 1999, the court decertified the class and ruled as a matter of law that a disparate impact theory of liability is not available to plaintiffs bringing suit under the ADEA.

Question

May disparate impact claims be brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967?

Conclusion

The Court did not answer the question. In a per curiam opinion, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Florida Power Corp., 0 vote(s) against
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Per Curiam with Argument

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Adams v. Florida Power Corp., 535 U.S. 228 (2002),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_01_584/>
(last visited ).