Adams v. Florida Power Corp.

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
John Crabtree (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Glen D. Nager (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
01-584
Petitioner: 
Adams
Respondent: 
Florida Power Corp.
Opinion: 
535 U.S. 228 (2002)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Adams v. Florida Power Corp. , 535 U.S. 228 (2002)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_01_584)
Facts of the Case: 

The Florida Power Corporation (FPC) operated as a publicly-regulated electric utility monopoly until 1992, when Congress opened the industry to competition through the Energy Policy Act of 1992. Between 1992 and 1996, FPR terminated Wanda Adams and others during a series of reorganizations the company stated were necessary to maintain its competitiveness. Members of the Adams class sued FPC, claiming that FPC discriminated against them because of their age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA). In 1996, the District Court conditionally certified a class of former FPC employees claiming age discrimination. In 1999, the court decertified the class and ruled as a matter of law that a disparate impact theory of liability is not available to plaintiffs bringing suit under the ADEA.

Question: 

May disparate impact claims be brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967?

Conclusion: 

The Court did not answer the question. In a per curiam opinion, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Florida Power Corp., 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Per Curiam with Argument