The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, April 23, 2002
Decision: Thursday, June 20, 2002
Issues: Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation

Advocates

Richard A. Cordray (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Jeffrey S. Sutton (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Malcolm L. Stewart (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioners)

Facts of the Case

Pursuant to 49 USC section 14501(c)(2)(A), federal preemption prescriptions relating to motor carriers "shall not restrict the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles." Columbus, Ohio, extensively regulates the operation of tow trucks seeking to pick up vehicles within city limits. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, Inc., a tow-truck operator and a trade association of such operators, sought to enjoin enforcement of the City's tow-truck regulations on the ground that they were preempted. The District Court granted Ours Garage summary judgment. In affirming, the Court of Appeals relied on precedent that section 14501(c)(1)'s preemption rule explicitly applies to "a State [or] political subdivision of a State," while the exception for safety regulations, section 14501(c)(2)(A), refers only to the "authority of a State." The appellate court also noted that precedent determined that the contrast in statutory language indicated that Congress meant to limit the safety exception to States alone.

Question

May the state power reserved in 49 USC section 14501(c)(2)(A) be delegated to municipalities, permitting them to exercise safety regulatory authority over local tow-truck operations?

Conclusion

Yes. In a 7-2 opinion delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that section 14501(c) does not bar a State from delegating to municipalities and other local units the State's authority to establish safety regulations governing motor carriers of property, including tow trucks. "A locality, as section 14501(c) recognizes, is a 'political subdivision' of the State," wrote Justice Ginsburg. "Ordinarily, a political subdivision may exercise whatever portion of state power the State...chooses to delegate to the subdivision. Absent a clear statement to the contrary, Congress' reference to the 'regulatory authority of a State' should be read to preserve, not preempt, the traditional prerogative of the States to delegate their authority to their constituent parts." Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a dissent, in which Justice Sandra Day O'Connor joined.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for City of Columbus, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Interstate Commerce, as amended
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, City of Columbus v. Ours Garage and Wrecker Service, 536 U.S. 424 (2002),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_01_419/>
(last visited ).