Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
David J. Bederman (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Julie C. Parsley (Austin, Texas, argued the cause for the Texas, e al., as amicus curiae, supporting the respondents)
Devon Orland (Atlanta, Georgia, argued the cause for the respondents)
Irving L. Gornstein (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
01-298
Petitioner: 
Lapides
Respondent: 
Board of Regents of University System of Georgia
Opinion: 
535 U.S. 613 (2002)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia , 535 U.S. 613 (2002)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_01_298)
Facts of the Case: 

Paul Lapides, a professor employed by the Georgia state university system, filed a state-court lawsuit against the system?s board of regents and other university officials, alleging that the officials had violated state tort law and 42 USC section 1983 when they placed sexual harassment allegations in his personnel files. The defendants removed the case to Federal District Court and then sought a dismissal. Conceding that a state statute had waived Georgia's sovereign immunity from state-law suits in state court, the State claimed Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in the federal court. The District Court held that Georgia had waived such immunity when it removed the case to federal court. In reversing, the Court of Appeals found that, because state law was unclear as to whether the state attorney general had the legal authority to waive Georgia's Eleventh Amendment immunity, the State retained the legal right to assert immunity, even after the removal.

Question: 

Does a State's act of removing a lawsuit from state court to federal court waive the State's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court by citizens of other States?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the Court held that a State waives its Eleventh Amendment immunity when it removes a case from state court to federal court. The Court concluded that that the university officials' voluntary removal of the action expressly invoked the jurisdiction of the federal courts and thus constituted a waiver of sovereign immunity with regard to state law claims for which immunity was waived in state court. Under the general principle that a State's voluntary appearance in federal court amounts to a waiver of its Eleventh Amendment immunity, the Court reasoned that Georgia was brought involuntarily into the case as a defendant in state court, but it then voluntarily removed the case to federal court, thus voluntarily invoking that court's jurisdiction.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Lapides, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 11: Eleventh Amendment

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Wrote the majority opinion
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Stephen G. Breyer