Owasso Independent School Dist. No. I011 v. Falvo

Media Items
Owasso Independent School Dist. No. I011 v. Falvo - Oral Argument
Owasso Independent School Dist. No. I011 v. Falvo - Opinion Announcement
Advocates
Edwin S. Kneedler (Argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae, by special leave of the court, supporting the petitioners)
Jerry A. Richardson (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Wilfred K. Wright, Jr. (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
00-1073
Petitioner: 
Owasso Independent School Dist. No. I011
Respondent: 
Falvo
Opinion: 
534 U.S. 426 (2002)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Owasso Independent School Dist. No. I011 v. Falvo , 534 U.S. 426 (2002)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2001/2001_00_1073)
Facts of the Case: 

Kristja J. Falvo asked the Owasso Independent School District to ban peer grading, or the practice of allowing students to score each other's tests, papers, and assignments as the teachers explain the correct answers to the entire class, because it embarrassed her children. When the school district declined, Falvo filed an action against the school district, claming that such peer grading violates the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). FERPA authorizes federal funds to be withheld from school districts that permit students' "education records (or personally identifiable information contained therein)" to be released without their parents' written consent and defines education records as "records, files, documents, and other materials" containing information directly related to a student, which "are maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a person acting for such agency or institution." Disagreeing with Falvo, the District Court held that grades put on papers by another student are not "education records." In reversing, the Court of Appeals found that grades marked by students on each other's work are "education records," such that the very act of grading is an impermissible release of information to the student grader.

Question: 

Does the practice of peer grading violate the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the Court held that Peer grading does not violate FERPA. The Court reasoned that peer-graded items did not constitute education records protected by FERPA until a teacher collected the grades on the students' papers or other items and recorded the grades in the teacher's grade book. In reaching its conclusion, the Court noted that peer-graded items were not "maintained" within in the meaning of FERPA, as the student graders only handled the items for a few moments. Moreover, the Court stated that each student grader, by grading assignments, did not constitute a person acting for an educational institution within FERPA.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Owasso Independent School Dist. No. I011, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Family Educational Rights and Privacy (Buckley Amendment)

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a special concurrence
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

Recommended