Missouri Director of Revenue v. CoBank ACB

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Richard A. Hanson (Argued the cause for the respondent)
David C. Frederick (Department of Justice, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
James R. Layton (Jefferson City, Missouri, argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
99-1792
Petitioner: 
Missouri Director of Revenue
Respondent: 
CoBank ACB
Opinion: 
531 U.S. 316 (2001)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Missouri Director of Revenue v. CoBank ACB , 531 U.S. 316 (2001)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_99_1792)
Facts of the Case: 

The Farm Credit Act of 1933 created various lending institutions, including banks for cooperatives, which are designated as federally chartered instrumentalities of the United States. CoBank ACB is the successor to all rights and obligations of the National Bank for Cooperatives. In 1996, CoBank filed amended returns on behalf of that bank, requesting an exemption from all Missouri corporate income taxes and refunds on the taxes it paid for 1991 through 1994. CoBank asserted that the Supremacy Clause accords federal instrumentalities immunity from state taxation unless Congress has expressly waived this immunity, which the Act did not expressly do. The state of Missouri denied the request, but the State Supreme Court reversed, stating that because the Act's current version is silent as to the banks' tax immunity, Congress cannot be said to have expressly consented to state income taxation and, thus, the banks are exempt.

Question: 

Is the National Bank for Cooperatives, which Congress has designated as a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States, exempt from state income taxation?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held that banks for cooperatives are subject to taxation. Justice Thomas wrote for the Court that nothing in the 1985 amendments to the Farm Credit Act indicated a repeal of the previous express approval of state taxation and that the structure of the Act indicated by negative implication that banks for cooperatives were not entitled to immunity.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Missouri Director of Revenue, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 12 U.S.C. 2134

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas