The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, April 25, 2001
Decision: Monday, June 4, 2001
Issues: Judicial Power, Review of Non-Final Order

Advocates

Cynthia J. Dodge (Bartow, Florida, argued the cause for the respondent)
Gregory G. Garre (Department of Justice, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
Robert J. Krauss (Tampa, Florida, argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

While officers were investigating marijuana sales at Florida home, Robert Thomas drove up to the house. An officer asked Thomas for his name and driver license. Thomas was arrested when a search on his license revealed an outstanding warrant. After taking Thomas inside the house, the officer searched Thomas' car and found methamphetamine. Subsequently, the trial court granted Thomas' motion to suppress. In reversing, the appellate found the search valid under New York v. Belton. In New York v. Belton, the U.S. Supreme Court established a "bright-line" rule permitting an officer who has made a lawful custodial arrest of a car's occupant to search the car's passenger compartment as a contemporaneous incident of the arrest. In reversing, the Florida Supreme Court held Belton did not apply because it is limited to situations where the officer initiates contact with a vehicle's occupant while that person remains in the vehicle.

Question

Is New York v. Belton's bright-line rule limited to situations where the officer initiates contact with a vehicle's occupant while that person remains in the vehicle?

Conclusion

In a unanimous opinion delivered by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari for want of jurisdiction. Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote that the Florida Supreme Court's decision did not fit any of the categories where the Court "treated state-court judgments as final for jurisdictional purposes although there were further proceedings to take place in the state court." Thus, the Court concluded that the Florida Supreme Court's decision was not final.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Thomas, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 28 U.S.C. 1257
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Florida v. Thomas, 532 U.S. 774 (2001),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_00_391/>
(last visited ).