The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, April 18, 2001
Decision: Monday, June 4, 2001
Issues: Economic Activity, Election of Remedies

Advocates

James T. Ferrini (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Patrick H. O'Donnell (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

Christopher Garris' mother filed a complaint in Federal District Court alleging that her son died as the result of injuries he sustained while sandblasting aboard the USNS Maj. Stephen W. Pless. Because the vessel was berthed in the navigable waters of the United States, Garris invoked federal admiralty jurisdiction and sought damages under general maritime law. Garris asserted that the injuries were caused by the negligence of Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation. The District Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a federal claim. The court stated that no cause of action exists, under general maritime law, for death resulting from negligence. In reversing, the Court of Appeals noted that although the U.S. Supreme Court had not yet recognized a maritime cause of action for wrongful death resulting from negligence, the action was made appropriate by principles contained in precedent.

Question

Does a maritime cause of action for wrongful death resulting from negligence exist?

Conclusion

Yes. In an opinion delivered by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court held that the general maritime cause of action for death caused by violation of maritime duties is available for the negligent breach of a maritime duty of care. "The general maritime law has recognized the tort of negligence for more than a century, and it has been clear since [Moragne v. States Marine Lines Inc.] that breaches of a maritime duty are actionable when they cause death, as when they cause injury," wrote Justice Scalia for the Court. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote an opinion concurring in part, which was joined by Justices David H. Souter and Stephen G. Breyer.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Garris, 0 vote(s) against
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority, joined Ginsburg's concurrence
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a regular concurrence
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority, joined Ginsburg's concurrence
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Norfolk Shipbuilding v. Garris, 532 U.S. 811 (2001),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_00_346/>
(last visited ).