The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Monday, March 19, 2001
Decision: Monday, April 30, 2001
Issues: Civil Rights, Indians, State Jurisdiction Over

Advocates

Gregory S. Coleman (On behalf of Texas, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
Gregory G. Garre (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the respondent)
John D. Mashburn (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Michael Minnis (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

The Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, a federally recognized Tribe, entered into a contract with C & L Enterprises, Inc., for the installation of a roof on a Tribe-owned building in Oklahoma. The property rests outside the Tribe's reservation and is not held in trust by the Federal Government for the Tribe. The contract contains clauses requiring disputes arising out of the contract to be decided by arbitration and a choice-of-law clause that reads: "The contract shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located." Thus, Oklahoma law governed the contract. After the contract was executed, but before performance commenced, the Tribe retained another company to install the roof. C & L then submitted an arbitration demand. The Tribe asserted sovereign immunity. The arbitrator awarded C & L a monetary award. Ultimately, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals held that the Tribe was immune from suit. The court noted that the contract seemed to indicate the Tribe's willingness to expose itself to suit on the contract, but concluded that the Tribe had not waived its suit immunity with the requisite clarity.

Question

Does a federally recognized tribe waives its immunity from suit in state court when it expressly agrees to arbitrate disputes relating to a contract, to the governance of state law, and to the enforcement of arbitral awards in any court with proper jurisdiction?

Conclusion

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that "under the agreement the Tribe proposed and signed, the Tribe clearly consented to arbitration and to the enforcement of arbitral awards in Oklahoma state court; the Tribe thereby waived its sovereign immunity from C & L's suit." Justice Ginsburg wrote for the Court that "the Tribe agreed, by express contract, to adhere to certain dispute resolution procedures."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for C&L Enterprises, 0 vote(s) against
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, C&L Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi, 532 U.S. 411 (2001),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_00_292/>
(last visited ).