C&L Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi

Media Items
C&L Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
C&L Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Gregory S. Coleman (On behalf of Texas, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
Michael Minnis (Argued the cause for the respondent)
John D. Mashburn (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Gregory G. Garre (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
00-292
Petitioner: 
C&L Enterprises
Respondent: 
Citizen Band Potawatomi
Opinion: 
532 U.S. 411 (2001)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, C&L Enterprises v. Citizen Band Potawatomi , 532 U.S. 411 (2001)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_00_292)
Facts of the Case: 

The Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, a federally recognized Tribe, entered into a contract with C & L Enterprises, Inc., for the installation of a roof on a Tribe-owned building in Oklahoma. The property rests outside the Tribe's reservation and is not held in trust by the Federal Government for the Tribe. The contract contains clauses requiring disputes arising out of the contract to be decided by arbitration and a choice-of-law clause that reads: "The contract shall be governed by the law of the place where the Project is located." Thus, Oklahoma law governed the contract. After the contract was executed, but before performance commenced, the Tribe retained another company to install the roof. C & L then submitted an arbitration demand. The Tribe asserted sovereign immunity. The arbitrator awarded C & L a monetary award. Ultimately, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals held that the Tribe was immune from suit. The court noted that the contract seemed to indicate the Tribe's willingness to expose itself to suit on the contract, but concluded that the Tribe had not waived its suit immunity with the requisite clarity.

Question: 

Does a federally recognized tribe waives its immunity from suit in state court when it expressly agrees to arbitrate disputes relating to a contract, to the governance of state law, and to the enforcement of arbitral awards in any court with proper jurisdiction?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court held that "under the agreement the Tribe proposed and signed, the Tribe clearly consented to arbitration and to the enforcement of arbitral awards in Oklahoma state court; the Tribe thereby waived its sovereign immunity from C & L's suit." Justice Ginsburg wrote for the Court that "the Tribe agreed, by express contract, to adhere to certain dispute resolution procedures."

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for C&L Enterprises, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote the majority opinion
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg