Christensen v. Harris County

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Matthew D. Roberts (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of court)
Michael P. Fleming (Houston, Texas, argued the cause for the respondents)
Michael T. Leibig (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
98-1167
Petitioner: 
Christensen
Respondent: 
Harris County
Opinion: 
529 U.S. 576 (2000)
Decided: 
Monday, May 1, 2000

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Christensen v. Harris County , 529 U.S. 576 (2000)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_1167)
Facts of the Case: 

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) permits governmental entities to compensate their employees for overtime work by granting them compensatory time in lieu of cash payment. If the employees do not use their accumulated compensatory time, the employer must pay cash compensation under certain circumstances. Harris County, Texas, found that too many of its deputy sheriffs had too many hours of accrued compensatory time. Fearing a budget crisis, the county adopted a policy under which its employees could be ordered to schedule compensatory time at specified times in order to reduce the amount of accrued time that would otherwise require cash payment. Edward Christensen and 128 other deputy sheriffs in Harris County believed they had the right to use their compensatory time when they saw fit. The sheriffs sued, claiming that the FLSA does not permit an employer to compel an employee to use compensatory time in the absence of an agreement permitting the employer to do so. The District Court ruled in favor of the sheriffs, concluding that the policy violated the FLSA. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that the FLSA did not address the issue in question and thus did not prohibit the county from implementing a compensatory time policy.

Question: 

Does the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 prohibit a public employer from compelling its employees to use their compensatory time without a preexisting agreement?

Conclusion: 

No. In an opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held 6-3 that "[n]othing in the FLSA or its implementing regulations prohibits a public employer from compelling the use of compensatory time." Justice Thomas wrote for the Court that, "under the FLSA, an employer is free to require an employee to take time off work, and an employer is also free to use the money it would have paid in wages to cash out accrued compensatory time. The compelled use of compensatory time challenged in this case merely involves doing both of these steps at once."

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Harris County, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Fair Labor Standards

Sort by Seniority

Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote a regular concurrence
Souter
Wrote a dissent, joined Stevens' dissent
Breyer
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a regular concurrence
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas