The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, February 23, 2000
Decision: Monday, May 1, 2000
Issues: Unions, Fair Labor Standards Act

Advocates

Michael P. Fleming (Houston, Texas, argued the cause for the respondents)
Michael T. Leibig (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Matthew D. Roberts (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of court)

Facts of the Case

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) permits governmental entities to compensate their employees for overtime work by granting them compensatory time in lieu of cash payment. If the employees do not use their accumulated compensatory time, the employer must pay cash compensation under certain circumstances. Harris County, Texas, found that too many of its deputy sheriffs had too many hours of accrued compensatory time. Fearing a budget crisis, the county adopted a policy under which its employees could be ordered to schedule compensatory time at specified times in order to reduce the amount of accrued time that would otherwise require cash payment. Edward Christensen and 128 other deputy sheriffs in Harris County believed they had the right to use their compensatory time when they saw fit. The sheriffs sued, claiming that the FLSA does not permit an employer to compel an employee to use compensatory time in the absence of an agreement permitting the employer to do so. The District Court ruled in favor of the sheriffs, concluding that the policy violated the FLSA. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that the FLSA did not address the issue in question and thus did not prohibit the county from implementing a compensatory time policy.

Question

Does the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 prohibit a public employer from compelling its employees to use their compensatory time without a preexisting agreement?

Conclusion

No. In an opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held 6-3 that "[n]othing in the FLSA or its implementing regulations prohibits a public employer from compelling the use of compensatory time." Justice Thomas wrote for the Court that, "under the FLSA, an employer is free to require an employee to take time off work, and an employer is also free to use the money it would have paid in wages to cash out accrued compensatory time. The compelled use of compensatory time challenged in this case merely involves doing both of these steps at once."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Harris County, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Fair Labor Standards
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a regular concurrence
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote a regular concurrence
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote a dissent, joined Stevens' dissent
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Christensen v. Harris County, 529 U.S. 576 (2000),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_1167/>
(last visited ).