Wyoming v. Houghton

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Barbara B. McDowell (Department of Justice, for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
Paul S. Rehurek (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Donna D. Domonkos (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
98-184
Petitioner: 
Wyoming
Respondent: 
Houghton
Opinion: 
526 U.S. 295 (1999)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Wyoming v. Houghton , 526 U.S. 295 (1999)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_98_184)
Facts of the Case: 

After pulling Sandra Haughton's friend over during a routine traffic stop, a Wyoming Highway Patrol officer noticed a needle in the driver's shirt pocket. Upon learning that the needle was used for drugs, the officer searched the car and Haughton's purse, where he found more drug paraphernalia. Haughton challenged her subsequent arrest on drug charges, alleging that the officer's search of her purse was unconstitutional. On appeal from an adverse appeals court ruling, overturning a favorable trial court decision, the Supreme Court granted Wyoming certiorari.

Question: 

May police officers, with probable cause to search a car, inspect personal items belonging to its passengers without violating the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a 6-to-3 decision the Court held that so long as there is probable cause to search a stopped vehicle, all subsequent searches of its contents are legal as well. The Court added that such searches are especially warranted if aimed at looking into objects or personal belongings capable of concealing items that are the object of the search.

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Wyoming, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote a regular concurrence
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia