The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, April 27, 1999
Decision: Tuesday, June 22, 1999
Issues: Civil Rights, Rights of Handicapped

Advocates

James A. Feldman (Department of Justice, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
William J. Kilberg (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Stephen R. McAllister (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

At the time of his hiring by United Parcel Service (UPS) to a mechanics position that required him to drive commercial trucks, Vaughn Murphy was misdiagnosed as meeting Department of Transportation (DOT) health guidelines. When UPS discovered that Murphy's blood pressure exceeded DOT requirements, they fired him. Murphy challenged his dismissal as a form of discrimination prohibited under Title I of the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Following defeat in trial and appellate courts, Murphy appealed and the Supreme Court granted him certiorari.

Question

Is high blood pressure a "substantial impairment" that might limit one's life activities to such an extent as to justify their being called "disabled" and, therefore, entitled to protection under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act?

Conclusion

No. In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that the determination of whether one is "disabled" under the ADA must be made in light of available mitigating circumstances. In the present case, the Court did not find Murphy "disabled" since he could function normally with the help of blood pressure medication. Moreover, although no longer able to serve as a commercial truck driver for UPS, Murphy could still work as a mechanic - the position for which he was officially hired. The Court concluded that in order to be designated as "disabled" an employee must be unable to perform more than just one task.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for United Parcel Service, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Murphy v. United Parcel Service, 527 U.S. 516 (1999),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_97_1992/>
(last visited ).