Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Bruce S. Rogow (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Carter G. Phillips (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
97-5310
Petitioner: 
Beach
Respondent: 
Ocwen Federal Bank
Opinion: 
523 U.S. 410 (1998)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Beach v. Ocwen Federal Bank , 523 U.S. 410 (1998)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_97_5310)
Facts of the Case: 

David and Linda Beach refinanced their Florida house in 1986 with a loan from Great Western Bank. In 1991, they stopped making mortgage payments. In 1992, Great Western began foreclosure proceedings. While the Beach's acknowledged their default, they alleged that the bank's failure to make disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act gave them the right under federal law to rescind the mortgage agreement. The Florida trial court rejected that defense, holding that any right to rescind had expired in 1989 under federal law which provides that the right of rescission shall expire three years after the loan closes. The state's intermediate appellate court affirmed, as did the Florida Supreme Court.

Question: 

Can homeowners who face foreclosure rescind a mortgage loan on the ground that the lender violated the federal truth-in-lending law?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous decision, announced by Justice David H. Souter, the Court ruled no such defense could be raised after the three-year deadline of the federal Truth in Lending Act expires.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Ocwen Federal Bank, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 15 U.S.C. 1635

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote the majority opinion
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice David H. Souter