Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Patricia A. Millett (on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Respondent)
David A. Strauss (on behalf of the Respondent)
Kenneth N. Flaxman (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
97-501
Petitioner: 
Ricci
Respondent: 
Village of Arlington Heights
Opinion: 
523 U.S. 613 (1998)
Decided: 
Monday, May 4, 1998

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights , 523 U.S. 613 (1998)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_97_501)
Facts of the Case: 

Randall Ricci owns Rudeway Enterprises, a telemarketing business. After the Arlington Heights police department determined that Ricci lacked the required business license and that one of Ricci's employees had an outstanding warrant, officers went to Rudeway Enterprises to arrest the employee. While arresting the employee, the officers also searched Ricci's business papers without a warrant. Subsequently, Ricci was arrested for violating Section 9-201 of the Village of Arlington Heights Code of Ordinances, which makes it unlawful to operate a business without a license. Ultimately, Ricci filed a claim that the officers violated his civil rights by subjecting him to a full custodial arrest for committing a fine-only offense. The District Court dismissed the claim. Finding the arrest reasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes, the Court of Appeals rejected Ricci's argument that a full custodial arrest for violation of a fine-only ordinance is constitutionally permissible only if the violation involves a breach of the peace.

Question: 

May police officers who do not have a warrant arrest someone for a violation of a fine-only ordinance?

Conclusion: 

The Court did not answer the question. The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Village of Arlington Heights, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Writ Improvidently Granted

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Per Curiam with Argument