Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1997» Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

Docket: 97-42
Citation: 524 U.S. 498 (1998)
Petitioner: Eastern Enterprises
Respondent: Apfel

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 4, 1998
Decision: Thursday, June 25, 1998
Issues: Due Process, Takings Clause

Advocates

Peter Buscemi (on behalf of the Respondents UMWA)
Edwin S. Kneedler (supporting the Federal Respondents)
John T. Montgomery (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Currently unknown.

Question

Currently unknown.

Conclusion

Currently unknown.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Eastern Enterprises, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Takings Clause
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Stevens
Wrote the judgment of the Court
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote a special concurrence
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Souter
Wrote a regular concurrence
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote a dissent, joined Stevens' dissent
Breyer
Judgment of the Court by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_97_42/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement