Cohen v. De La Cruz

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Gregory G. Diebold (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Jeffrey A. Lamken (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae supporting the respondents)
Donald B. Ayer (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
96-1923
Petitioner: 
Cohen
Respondent: 
De La Cruz
Opinion: 
523 U.S. 213 (1998)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Cohen v. De La Cruz , 523 U.S. 213 (1998)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_96_1923)
Facts of the Case: 

After the local rent control administrator ordered Edward S. Cohen to refund $31,382.50 in excessive rents he had charged Hilda de la Cruz and other tenants, Cohen sought to discharge his debts under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The tenants filed an adversary proceeding, arguing that the debt Cohen owed to them was nondischargeable under ?523(a)(2)(A) of the Code, which excepts from discharge "any debt ... for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by ... actual fraud." The tenants also sought treble damages, attorney's fees, and costs under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. The Bankruptcy Court ruled in their favor, finding that Cohen had committed "actual fraud" within the meaning of ?523(a)(2)(A) of the Code and that his conduct violated the New Jersey law. The court, therefore, awarded the tenants treble damages totaling $94,147.50, plus attorney's fees and costs. The District Court affirmed, as did the Court of Appeals, which held that debts resulting from fraud are nondischargeable under ?523(a)(2)(A) of the Code, and that the award of treble damages (plus attorney's fees and costs) in this case was therefore nondischargeable.

Question: 

May individuals who commit fraud discharge their debts, including damages awarded to those who were defrauded, under the Bankruptcy Code?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, The Court ruled that because Section 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code excepts from discharge all liability arising from fraud, treble damages (plus attorney's fees and costs) awarded on account of the debtor's fraud fall within the scope of the exception. Justice O'Connor wrote, "The bankruptcy code has long prohibited debtors from discharging liabilities incurred on account of their fraud, embodying a basic policy...of affording relief only to an honest but unfortunate debtor."

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for De La Cruz, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor