Gebser v. Lago Vista Ind. School Dist.

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Beth S. Brinkmann (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioners)
Wallace B. Jefferson (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Terry L. Weldon (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
96-1866
Petitioner: 
Gebser
Respondent: 
Lago Vista Ind. School Dist.
Opinion: 
524 U.S. 274 (1998)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Gebser v. Lago Vista Ind. School Dist. , 524 U.S. 274 (1998)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_96_1866)
Facts of the Case: 

Alida Star Gebser, a high school student in the Lago Vista Independent School District ("Lago Vista"), had a secret sexual affair with one of her teachers. At the time, Lago Vista had no official procedure for reporting sexual harassment nor any formal anti-harassment policy, as required by federal law. One day, after the two were discovered having sex, the teacher was arrested and fired. Claiming she was harassed in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (the "Amendments"), providing that no person "be subjected to discrimination" under any federally funded education program or activity, Gebser sought damages against Lago Vista. On appeal from a decision affirming a district court's ruling in favor of Lago Vista, the Supreme Court granted Gebser certiorari.

Question: 

Can a federally funded educational program or activity be required, under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, to pay sexual harassment damages to a student who was involved in a secret relationship with a member of its staff?

Conclusion: 

No. In a 5-to-4 decision the Court held that two minimal criteria must be met in order for an aggrieved party to recover sexual harassment damages under the Amendments. First, the party must show that a school district official, with the ability to institute corrective measures, knew of the forbidden conduct. Second, a showing must be made that despite having knowledge of the forbidden conduct, the educational establishment deliberately failed to respond in a proper manner. The Court concluded that Lago Vista never showed indifference to Gebser's relationship since it never knew, either formally or informally, of its existence. Accordingly, Lago Vista was not liable for sexual harassment damages.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Lago Vista Ind. School Dist., 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Education Amendments of 1972

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a dissent, joined Stevens' dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor