Muscarello v. United States

Media Items
Muscarello v. United States - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Norman S. Zalkind (Argued the cause for petitioners Cleveland and Gray-Santana in No. 96-8837)
Robert H. Klonoff (Argued the cause for petitioner Muscarello in No. 96-1654)
James A. Feldman (Department of Justice, argued the cause for the respondent in both cases)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
96-1654
Petitioner: 
Muscarello
Respondent: 
United States
Consolidation: 
No. 96-8837
Opinion: 
524 U.S. 125 (1998)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Muscarello v. United States , 524 U.S. 125 (1998)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_96_1654)
Facts of the Case: 

18 USC section 924(c)(1) subjects a person who "uses or carries a firearm" "during and in relation to" a "drug trafficking crime" to a 5-year mandatory prison term. In 96-1654, police officers found a handgun locked in Frank J. Muscarello's truck's glove compartment. Muscarello was transporting marijuana for sale in his truck. Muscarello argued that his "carrying" of the gun in the glove compartment did not fall within the scope of the statutory word "carries." In 96-8837, federal agents found drugs and guns in Donald Cleveland and Enrique Gray-Santana's car at a drug-sale point. The Court of Appeals, in both cases, found that the defendants had violated section 924(c)(1).

Question: 

Does the fact that guns were found in a locked glove compartment, or the trunk, of a car, preclude the application of 18 U section 924(c)(1), which imposes a 5-year mandatory prison term upon a person who "uses or carries a firearm" "during and in relation to" a "drug trafficking crime"?

Conclusion: 

No. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the Court held that the phrase "carries a firearm" applies to a person who knowingly possesses and conveys firearms in a vehicle, including in the locked glove compartment or trunk of a car, which the person accompanies. Exploring the meaning of "carry," Justice Breyer concluded, among other things, that the statute's basic purpose to combat the dangerous combination of drugs and guns does not support limiting "carry" to an "on the person" application. In a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and David H. Souter, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued that "carries a firearm" means bearing a firearm in a manner as to be ready to use it as a weapon.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for United States, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 924

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the minority, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote the majority opinion
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Stephen G. Breyer