The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, November 4, 1997
Decision: Monday, June 22, 1998
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty
Categories: criminal

Advocates

James E. Blatt (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Irving L. Gornstein (Department of Justice, argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

During a routine check of departing international flight passengers, customs officers discovered $357,144 on the person of Hosep Bajakajian. In addition to charging him, under 31 U.S.C. Section 5316, of attempting to leave the United States with an unreported sum in excess of $10,000 cash, the government also sought forfeiture of the entire $357,144 under 18 U.S.C. Section 982 providing that the deliberate violation of Section 5316 shall result in the forfeiture of "any property involved in such an offense." After having its forfeiture claim rejected in both a district court and the Ninth Circuit, as excessively unconstitutional, the Supreme Court granted the government certiorari.

Question

Is the forfeiture of $357,144 cash, a sum involved in the offense of failure to report property in excess of $10,000 while attempting to leave the country, a violation of the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause?

Conclusion

Yes. In a 5-to-4 opinion, the Court held that the government's ability to extract fines is limited by the Excessive Fines Clause. The forfeiture of currency, when ordered for a violation of a reporting statute, is a punitive measure which constitutes a "fine" under the Eighth Amendment. Noting the importance of making punishments proportional to their crimes, the Court reminded that currency transportation is generally permissible. Bajakajian's failure to do so within statutory reporting guidelines was neither related to other illegal activity nor did it result in loss to the government. Therefore, forfeiture of the entire sum would be grossly disproportional to the gravity of his offense.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Bajakajian, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 18 U.S.C. 982
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_96_1487/>
(last visited ).