Agostini v. Felton

Media Items
Agostini v. Felton - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Agostini v. Felton - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Paul A. Crotty (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Walter E. Dellinger, III (Argued the cause for the federal respondent, supporting the petitioners)
Stanley Geller (Argued the cause for the private respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
96-552
Petitioner: 
Agostini
Respondent: 
Felton
Consolidation: 
No. 96-553
Opinion: 
521 U.S. 203 (1997)
Categories: 
conlaw
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Agostini v. Felton , 521 U.S. 203 (1997)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_96_552)
Facts of the Case: 

This suit was brought by a New York parochial school board, and some of its student's parents, as a challenge to a District Court ruling upholding the twelve-year-old decision set out in Aguilar v. Felton (473 US 402). The decision in Aguilar prohibited public school teachers from teaching in parochial schools as a violation of the Establishment Clause. On appeal from the Second Circuit's affirmance of a District Court's denial of the parent's challenge, the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Question: 

Is the Establishment Clause violated when public school teachers instruct in parochial schools?

Conclusion: 

No. The Court overruled its decision in Aguilar v. Felton. The Court held that there was no evidence to support its former presumption that the entrance of public school teachers into parochial schools will inevitably lead to the indoctrination of state-sponsored religion. The New York program under which public school teachers were sent into parochial schools did not provide parochial schools with any incentive, financial or other, to establish religion in order to attract public school teachers. The Court added that under its new view, only those policies which generate an excessive conflict between church and state will be deemed to violate the Establishment Clause. As such, one should no longer find that all entanglements between church and state have a distinctly positive or negative impact on religion.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Agostini, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Establishment of Religion

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, joined Souter's dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote a dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a dissent, joined Souter's dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the minority, joined Souter's dissent, joined Ginsburg's dissent
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor