The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, March 19, 1997
Decision: Monday, June 23, 1997
Issues: Liability, Civil Rights Acts

Advocates

Edwin S. Kneedler (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of court, supporting the respondent)
Charles R. Ray (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
David C. Vladeck (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

Ronnie Lee McKnight, a prisoner at Tennessee's South Central Correctional Center (SCCC), filed suit, under 42 USC section 1983, against two prison guards after he was placed in extremely tight physical restraints. Previously, the SCCC's management had been privatized by the State. Ultimately, the prison guards, Darryl Richardson and John Walker, asserted a qualified immunity and moved to dismiss the action. The District Court denied the motion, finding that, since a private prison management firm employed them, they were not entitled to qualified immunity. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question

Are prison guards, who are employees of a private prison management firm, entitled to a qualified immunity from suit under 42 USC section 1983?

Conclusion

No. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the Court held that prison guards employed by a private firm are not entitled to a qualified immunity from suit by prisoners charging a section 1983 violation. Emphasizing that a private firm was systematically organized to manage the prison, Justice Breyer wrote that, "[o]ur examination of history and purpose...reveals nothing special enough about the job or about its organizational structure that would warrant providing these private prison guards with a governmental immunity." Dissenting, Justice Antonin Scalia argued that the Court had routinely determined section 1983 immunity on the basis of the public function being performed. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined Justice Scalia.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for McKnight, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Reconstruction Civil Rights Acts (42 USC 1983)
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
Breyer
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Stephen G. Breyer

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Richardson v. McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_96_318/>
(last visited ).