Auer v. Robbins

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
John B. Renick (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Irving L. Gornstein (Department of Justice, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae)
Michael T. Leibig (on behalf of the Petitioners)
Michael T. Liebig (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
95-897
Petitioner: 
Auer
Respondent: 
Robbins
Opinion: 
519 U.S. 452 (1997)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Auer v. Robbins , 519 U.S. 452 (1997)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_897)
Facts of the Case: 

Francis Bernard Auer, a St. Louis police sergeant, other St. Louis police sergeants, and a lieutenant sued the respondent police commissioners, including David A. Robbins, for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA). The commissioners argued that Auer and the other petitioners were "bona fide executive, administrative, or professional" employees exempted from overtime pay requirements by the FLSA. Under the Secretary of Labor's regulations, that exemption applies to employees paid a specified minimum amount on a "salary basis," which requires that the "compensation...not [be] subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed." Auer claimed that that they did not meet this test because, under the terms of the Police Department Manual, their compensation could theoretically be reduced for a variety of disciplinary infractions related to the "quality or quantity" of their work. The District Court and the Court of Appeals disagreed with Auer's claim. Both courts held that the salary basis test was satisfied.

Question: 

Must sergeants and lieutenants in the St. Louis Police Department be paid for working overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous decision, authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court ruled that sergeants and lieutenants are exempt as salaried employees from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The justices rejected the argument that the possibility of suspension without pay moves the officers out of the exempt category.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Robbins, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Fair Labor Standards

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia