United States v. Gonzales

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Miguel A. Estrada (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Edward O. Bustamante (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
95-1605
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
Gonzales
Opinion: 
520 U.S. 1 (1997)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. Gonzales , 520 U.S. 1 (1997)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_1605)
Facts of the Case: 

Miguel Gonzales, Orlenis Hernandez Diaz, and Mario Perez were convicted in New Mexico state court on charges arising from their use of guns to holdup undercover officers during a drug sting. After they began to serve their state sentences, they were convicted by a District Court on federal drug and firearm charges related to the sting. Federal law requires a five-year prison sentence for carrying a gun while committing a crime. A Court of Appeals vacated the additional firearms sentences on the ground that they should have run concurrently with the state prison terms.

Question: 

Can the federal mandatory five-year prison term for carrying a gun while committing a crime be served concurrently with a separate state sentence?

Conclusion: 

No. In a 7-to-2 decision delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court announced "[t]he plain language of (the law) forbids a district court to direct that a term of imprisonment under the statute run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment, whether state or federal."

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 924

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Wrote a dissent, joined Stevens' dissent
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor