Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel. Schumer

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Kenneth W. Starr (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Laurence E. Gold (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Seth P. Waxman (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, by special leave of court, supporting the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
95-1340
Petitioner: 
Hughes Aircraft Co.
Respondent: 
United States ex rel. Schumer
Opinion: 
520 U.S. 939 (1997)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States ex rel. Schumer , 520 U.S. 939 (1997)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_1340)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1989, William J. Schumer filed an action against Hughes Aircraft Co. under the False Claims Act (FCA), specifically under the qui tam provision which allows suits by private parties on behalf of the United States against anyone submitting a false claim to the government. Schumer alleged that Hughes had submitted false claims related to two Air Force radar projects between 1982 and 1984. Hughes moved to dismiss the case claiming that the 1986 amendment to the FCA that Schumer had filed under was not retroactive and that the alleged conduct precluded the suit because the government already had the information on which the suit was based. The motion was dismissed; however, the District Court ruled in favor of Hughes based on the merits of the case. Ultimately, the Court of Appeals rejected Hughes, finding that the FCA should be applied retroactively to suits pre-1986. The appellate court also found that, because no public disclosure of information possessed by the Government had been made, the action was not barred under the 1986 version of the Act.

Question: 

Does the False Claims Act, as amended in 1986, apply retroactively to qui tam suits regarding allegedly false claims submitted to the government submitted prior to is enactment?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held that, because the 1986 amendment does not apply retroactively to qui tam suits regarding allegedly false claims submitted prior to its enactment, Schumer's action should have been dismissed, as required by the pre-1986 version of the FCA. The Court reasoned that, prior to 1986, disclosure to the Government of information about the allegedly false claim would have constituted a full defense, which the retroactive application of the 1986 amendment would deprive Hughes of that defense. "Given the absence of a clear statutory expression of congressional intent to apply the 1986 amendment to conduct completed before its enactment, we apply our presumption against retroactivity," concluded Justice Thomas.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Hughes Aircraft Co., 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal False Claims

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas