Maryland v. Wilson

Media Items
Maryland v. Wilson - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
J. Joseph Curran, Jr. (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Janet Reno (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae supporting the petitioner)
Byron L. Warnkbn (on behalf of the Respondent)
Byron L. Warnken (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
95-1268
Petitioner: 
Maryland
Respondent: 
Wilson
Opinion: 
519 U.S. 408 (1997)
Categories: 
police power, fourth amendment, searches and seizures
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Maryland v. Wilson , 519 U.S. 408 (1997)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_1268)
Facts of the Case: 

After a Maryland state trooper stopped the speeding car in which he was riding, a nervous Wilson was ordered to step out. As he did, a quantity of cocaine fell on the ground. When arrested for possession with intent to distribute, Wilson challenged the manner in which the evidence against him was obtained. After the Baltimore County Circuit Court ruled to suppress the evidence against Wilson, Maryland appealed to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals - which affirmed. The Supreme Court granted Maryland certiorari.

Question: 

Did Maryland's state trooper violate the Fourth Amendment's search and seizure guarantees by ordering Wilson, a mere passenger in the suspect vehicle, to exit the car during a traffic stop?

Conclusion: 

No. The Court held that after lawfully stopping a speeding vehicle, an officer may order its passengers to step out. While burdening their personal liberty somewhat, officers must be permitted such authority over passengers if the overriding government's interest in officer safety is to be protected.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Maryland, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent, joined Kennedy's dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote a dissent, joined Stevens' dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court