The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, October 9, 1996
Decision: Monday, May 19, 1997
Issues: Economic Activity, State Tax

Advocates

William H. Dempsey (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
William L. Plouffe (Argued the cause for the respondents)

Facts of the Case

Camps Newfound/Owatonna Inc. (Camps) operates a children's church camp in Maine and finances its operations through a $400 per camper weekly tuition charge. The majority of its campers are out of state children. Maine's tax scheme exempts charitable institutions incorporated in the state, and provides a more limited tax benefit for institutions which principally benefit non-Maine residents so long as their weekly service charge does not exceed $30 per person. Ineligible for any exemptions, Camps challenged the constitutionality of Maine's tax exemption statute. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari following a reversal of a favorable Superior Court ruling by the Supreme Court of Maine.

Question

Did Maine's tax exemption statute violate the Commerce Clause?

Conclusion

Yes. In a 5-to-4 opinion, the Court held that Maine's tax exemption statute violated the dormant commerce clause since it selectively awarded greater tax benefits to those institutions which served mostly state residents, while penalizing institutions that conducted mostly interstate business. By imposing such selective benefits on a commercial activity in which it did not directly participate, the Court found Maine's governmental tax regulations to be an unconstitutional form of economic protectionism favoring local consumers and business providers.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Camps Newfound/Owatonna, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 3: Interstate Commerce Clause
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent, joined Thomas' dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a dissent, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Camps Newfound/Owatonna v. Harrison, 520 U.S. 564 (1997),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_94_1988/>
(last visited ).