The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Monday, March 18, 1996
Decision: Monday, June 10, 1996
Issues: Federal Taxation

Advocates

James R. Atwood (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Jeffrey P. Minear (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) paid a tax on insurance premiums it paid to foreign insurers to insure exports from the U.S. to foreign countries. IBM sought a refund on the tax and filed suit in the Court of Federal Claims when its refund claim was denied by the IRS. IBM contended the tax violated the Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which states that "[n]o Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State." The court agreed. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question

May the federal government impose a tax on premiums that U.S. businesses pay foreign insurers for risks that could arise in this country?

Conclusion

No. In a 6-2 decision, announced by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court ruled the tax did violate the Export Clause and was therefore unconstitutional.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for International Business Machines Corp., 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 5: Export Clause
Did not participate
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote a dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. International Business Machines Corp., 517 U.S. 843 (1996),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_95_591/>
(last visited ).