The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, February 27, 1996
Decision: Monday, June 17, 1996
Issues: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Sentencing Guidelines

Advocates

Irving L. Gornstein (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Patrick A. Mullin (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

After purchasing cocaine, Juan Melendez was charged with violating federal drug laws. The law carried a minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment. Melendez signed a plea agreement stating he would be cooperative. In turn the government agreed to give him a short sentence. The District Court thus sentenced Melendez to ten years in prison, the mandatory minimum. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question

Does a federal prosecutor's plea agreement that a cooperating defendant be given the minimum sentence authorize a judge to depart below a statutory minimum?

Conclusion

No. In a 7-2 decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held that, in the absence of a Government motion requesting or authorizing the district court to "impose a sentence below a level established by statute as minimum sentence," a prison sentence must not violate the statutory sentencing minimum.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 18 U.S.C. 3553
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
Breyer
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Wrote a regular concurrence
Souter
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Breyer's dissent
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Melendez v. United States, 518 U.S. 120 (1996),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_95_5661/>
(last visited ).