Jaffee v. Redmond

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Gregory E. Rogus (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Kenneth N. Flaxman (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
James A. Feldman (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, support the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
95-266
Petitioner: 
Jaffee
Respondent: 
Redmond
Opinion: 
518 U.S. 1 (1996)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Jaffee v. Redmond , 518 U.S. 1 (1996)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_95_266)
Facts of the Case: 

Mary Lu Redmond, a former police officer, received extensive counseling from a licensed clinical social worker after she shot and killed Ricky Allen. Carrie Jaffee, special administrator for Allen, filed suit in federal District Court alleging that Redmond had violated Allen's constitutional rights by using excessive force in the encounter. During the trial, Jaffee sought access to the notes from Redmond's counseling. Redmond's counsel resisted asserting the conversations were protected against involuntary disclosure by a psychotherapist-patient privilege. The District Court judge rejected the argument, but the notes were not released. The judge instructed the jury that they could presume that the contents could have been unfavorable to Redmond. The jury awarded monetary damages. The Court of Appeals reversed the decision. It found that Federal Rule of Evidence 501 prompted the recognition of a psychotherapist-patient privilege.

Question: 

Can psychotherapists be forced to provide evidence about their patients in federal court cases?

Conclusion: 

No. In a 7-2 decision, announced by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court ruled that Federal Rule of Evidence 501 protects the conversations between Redmond and her therapist from compelled disclosure. The Rule recognizes a "psychotherapist-patient privilege."

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Redmond, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal Rules of Evidence

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens