Rutledge v. United States

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
James A. Feldman (Argued the cause for the United States)
Barry Levenstam (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
94-8769
Petitioner: 
Rutledge
Respondent: 
United States
Opinion: 
517 U.S. 292 (1996)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Rutledge v. United States , 517 U.S. 292 (1996)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_8769)
Facts of the Case: 

Tommy L. Rutledge was found guilty of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and of conducting a continuing criminal enterprise. The District Court convicted Rutledge on both counts. It sentenced him to life imprisonment without possible release on each count. The sentences were to be served concurrently. The Court of Appeals affirmed. It rejected Rutledge's argument that his convictions and concurrent life sentences punished him twice for the same offense.

Question: 

Can a criminal be given concurrent life sentences for conspiring to distribute drugs and operating a continuing criminal enterprise?

Conclusion: 

No. In a unanimous decision, announced by Justice John Paul Stevens, the Court ruled one of the two sentences must be dropped. Both of the offenses were based on the same criminal act. Justice Stevens wrote, "A guilty verdict on a (continuing criminal enterprise) charge necessarily includes a finding that the defendant also participated in a conspiracy."

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Rutledge, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 21 U.S.C. 848

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens