The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, January 9, 1996
Decision: Monday, June 3, 1996
Issues: Civil Rights, Military Residency Requirements, Active Duty

Advocates

John H. Blume (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Edwin S. Kneedler (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

A general court-martial found Dwight J. Loving, an Army private, guilty of both premeditated murder and felony murder under Article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The court-martial sentenced Loving to death based on the aggravating factors that the premeditated murder was committed during a robbery and that he had committed a second murder. The commander who convened the court-martial approved the findings and sentence. In affirming, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces rejected Loving's contention that the President lacked the authority to prescribe aggravating factors in capital murder cases that enabled the court-martial to sentence him to death. Loving claimed that the separation-of-powers principle prevented the President from promulgating the Executive Order.

Question

Does the President have the authority, consistent with the separation-of-powers principle, to prescribe aggravating factors that permit a court-martial to impose the death penalty upon a member of the armed forces convicted of murder?

Conclusion

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court held that not only does the Constitution require the aggravating factors of the military's death penalty, but that the President's prescription of the challenged aggravating factors did not violate the separation-of-powers principle. Justice Kennedy wrote, "[a]lthough it may not delegate the power to make the law...Congress may delegate to others the authority or discretion to execute the law under and in pursuance of its terms."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for United States, 0 vote(s) against
Wrote a regular concurrence
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Breyer
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority, joined Stevens' concurrence
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority, joined Scalia's concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a regular concurrence
Scalia
Wrote a special concurrence
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Loving v. United States, 517 U.S. 748 (1996),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1966/>
(last visited ).