Oyez: Barnett Bank Of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, 517 U.S. 25 (1996), U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument

Barnett Bank Of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner

Docket:	94-1837
Citation:	517 U.S. 25 (1996)
Petitioner:	Barnett Bank Of Marion County, N. A.
Respondent:	Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Oral Argument:	Tuesday, January 16, 1996
Decision:	Tuesday, March 26, 1996
Issues:	Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation

Advocates

Richard P. Bress	(on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Ann Mary Kappler	(on behalf of the Private Respondents)
Nathan Lewin	(on behalf of the Petitioner)
Daniel Y. Sumner	(on behalf of the State Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Full Opinion: Federalism, Federal Preemption of State Regulation: 9 - 0

Stevens

Breyer

Ginsburg

Souter

Kennedy

O'Connor

Rehnquist

Scalia

Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Barnett Bank Of Marion County, N. A. v. Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, 517 U.S. 25 (1996),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1837/>
(last visited ).