Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. v. Pinette

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Michael J. Renner (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Benson A. Wolman (Argued the cause for the appellees)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
94-780
Petitioner: 
Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd.
Respondent: 
Pinette
Opinion: 
515 U.S. 753 (1995)
Categories: 
establishment of religion

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Capitol Square Review and Advisory Bd. v. Pinette , 515 U.S. 753 (1995)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_780)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1993, the Ku Klux Klan organization attempted to place an unattended cross on Capitol Square, the state-house plaza in Columbus, Ohio, during the 1993 Christmas season. Ohio law makes Capitol Square a forum for discussion of public questions and for public activities, and gives the Advisory Board responsibility for regulating access to the square. The Board denied the application of the Ku Klux Klan to erect the cross on Establishment Clause grounds.

Question: 

Did the Board's denial of a permit to the Ku Klux Klan violate free speech under the First Amendment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. The display was private religious speech that "is as fully protected under the Free Speech Clause as secular private expression." Because Capitol Square is designated as a traditional public forum, any group may express their views there, and the Board may regulate the content of the Klan's expression on the plaza only if a restriction is necessary and narrowly drawn to serve a compelling state interest.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Pinette, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Establishment of Religion

Sort by Seniority

Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
Ginsburg
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined O'Connor's concurrence
Souter
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's concurrence, joined Souter's concurrence
Breyer
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined Souter's concurrence
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Wrote a regular concurrence
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia