Vernonia School District v. Acton

Media Items
Vernonia School District v. Acton - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Vernonia School District v. Acton - Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Thomas M. Christ (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Timothy R. Volpert (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Richard H. Seamon (On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
94-590
Petitioner: 
Vernonia School District
Respondent: 
Acton
Opinion: 
515 U.S. 646 (1995)
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Vernonia School District v. Acton , 515 U.S. 646 (1995)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_590)
Facts of the Case: 

An official investigation led to the discovery that high school athletes in the Vernonia School District participated in illicit drug use. School officials were concerned that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury. Consequently, the Vernonia School District of Oregon adopted the Student Athlete Drug Policy which authorizes random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his school's football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.

Question: 

Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

No. The reasonableness of a search is judged by "balancing the intrusion on the individual's Fourth Amendment interests against the promotion of legitimate governmental interests." In the case of high school athletes who are under State supervision during school hours, they are subject to greater control than over free adults. The privacy interests compromised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed only by limited authorities. Furthermore, the governmental concern over the safety of minors under their supervision overrides the minimal, if any, intrusion in student-athletes' privacy.

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Vernonia School District, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Stevens
Wrote a dissent
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined O'Connor's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a regular concurrence
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court