The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, January 11, 1995
Decision: Wednesday, June 21, 1995
Issues: Attorneys, Commercial Speech

Advocates

Barry Scott Richard (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Bruce S. Rogow (Argued the cause for the respondents)

Facts of the Case

Went For It, Inc., (a lawyer referral service) and John T. Blakely (a Florida attorney) were sending targeted direct-mail solicitations to victims and their relatives who had been injured in an accident. According to Florida Bar rules, such direct and targeted mailings are prohibited for thirty days following an accident or disaster.

Question

Do the Florida Bar rules prohibiting direct mail solicitation of accident victims violate the free speech of personal injury attorneys?

Conclusion

No. Lawyer advertising is commercial speech and as such, is accorded only a limited measure of First Amendment protection. Under this "intermediate scrutiny," restriction on commercial speech is permissible if the government (1) asserts a substantial interest in support of its regulation; (2) establishes that the restriction directly and materially advances that interest; and (3) demonstrates that the regulation is narrowly drawn.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Florida Bar, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Wrote a dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Florida Bar v. Went For It Inc., 515 U.S. 618 (1995),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_226/>
(last visited ).