United States v. X-Citement Video

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Stanley Fleishman (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Drew S. Days, III (Argued the cause for the United States)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
93-723
Petitioner: 
United States
Respondent: 
X-Citement Video
Opinion: 
513 U.S. 64 (1994)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. X-Citement Video , 513 U.S. 64 (1994)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_723)
Facts of the Case: 

The Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977 prohibited the interstate transportation, shipping, receipt, distribution, or reproduction of visual materials containing children engaged in sexually explicit acts. Richard Gottesman, owner and manager of X-Citement Video, sold forty-nine tapes to undercover officers. Gottesman shipped the videos, containing pornographic acts by industry legend Traci Lords before she turned eighteen, to Hawaii. Although he claimed he did not know the tapes contained underage pornographic acts, Gottesman was arrested for violating the sexual exploitation act.

Question: 

Did the Act's use of the term "knowingly" violate the First Amendment's Free Speech clause by not mandating a showing that the alleged offender knew which materials contained under-age performances?

Conclusion: 

No. The Court relied on an awkward grammatical construction as it held that the term "knowingly" applied to the entire passage of the law. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice William Rehnquist stated that other interpretations failed to make sense since Congress obviously did not envision people accidentally mailing underage pornographic materials. All the law required was a showing that alleged violators intentionally distributed illegal pornography, regardless of whether they knew it depicted underage performances.

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for United States, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 2252

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist