Oyez: Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 514 U.S. 73 (1995), U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen

Case Media

Abstract

Oral Argument:	Tuesday, January 17, 1995
Decision:	Monday, March 6, 1995
Issues:	Economic Activity, Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Advocates

Richard P. Bress	(on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Thomas M. Kennedy	(on behalf of the Respondents)
Laurence Reich	(on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Full Opinion: Economic Activity, Employee Retirement Income Security Act: 9 - 0

Stevens

Ginsburg

Souter

Breyer

O'Connor

Kennedy

Rehnquist

Scalia

Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 514 U.S. 73 (1995),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1935/>
(last visited ).