Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1990-1999» 1994» Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen

Docket: 93-1935
Citation: 514 U.S. 73 (1995)
Petitioner: Curtiss-Wright Corp.
Respondent: Schoonejongen et al.

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, January 17, 1995
Decision: Monday, March 6, 1995
Issues: Economic Activity, Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Advocates

Richard P. Bress (on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
Thomas M. Kennedy (on behalf of the Respondents)
Laurence Reich (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Curtiss-Wright Corp., 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Employee Retirement Income Security
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 514 U.S. 73 (1995),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1935/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement