CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP. v. SCHOONEJONGEN

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
93-1935
Petitioner 
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
Respondent 
Schoonejongen et al.
Opinion 
Advocates
(on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner)
(on behalf of the Respondents)
(on behalf of the Petitioner)
Tags
Term:
Facts of the Case 

None

Question 

None

Conclusion 
Decision: 9 votes for Curtiss-Wright Corp., 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security

None

Cite this Page
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP. v. SCHOONEJONGEN. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 23 October 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1935>.
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP. v. SCHOONEJONGEN, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1935 (last visited October 23, 2014).
"CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP. v. SCHOONEJONGEN," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed October 23, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1935.